"Members of the public art committee say the "Unconditional Surrender" sculpture is "ornamental and decorative," which disqualifies it from being in the city's collection of public art."
You can read the entire article here.
When it was first displayed on the bayfront several years ago, Isabella and I had our picture taken in front of it (and no, we weren't kissing-LOL) . I can't find that pic- somewhere buried in a folder on my computer, but here is a photo that was in the newspaper with the article.
Is it art? It was sculpted from a photograph, so does that mean it isn't art? If that were true, portrait paintings wouldn't be considered art, or still life painting and sketches. So I'm not sure I buy the argument it isn't art because it was sculpted from a photo. It certainly isn't one of a kind because there are several others on display in other areas of the country. But is it art? I've seen this topic discussed so many times in art and doll makers forums, and there seems to be a variety of opinions. I do have to wonder about the wisdom of something this size on permanent display in a hurricane prone area.In my own little world, what I produce with my own hands (or camera) and my own creative vision is art, and what I make using things created by others is crafting. The Anna Maria canvases I consider art because everything, other than the shells, I created myself. And Mike's blues canvas? To me, it's crafting. All of the images I am using were created by someone else- the photos were taken from old album covers and the sheet music came from a book of music I bought. I'm taking images that already existed and embellishing them, then arranging them together on a canvas. I would never consider selling this canvas because of copy write issues.
Here are some photos of materials I've altered for Mike's blues canvas. All these strips of music that I've painted and splattered will be the background for the photos of the blues artists.


But here is some original one of kind art that appears weekly on my patio glass sliding door - nose art...
I used to clean it several times a day but finally gave up and only clean it once a week now. I have no idea why dogs have to put their noses directly on the glass. I could see them doing it once or twice thinking perhaps they could get through the glass. But don't you think they would figure out there was no way to go through? Having one tall dog and a short one, a large area of the glass gets "painted", with many interesting designs. Too bad paint doesn't come out their noses- I could get them to do some abstract paintings to sell on EBay. Remember a while back the elephant that painted canvases? Those sold for a pretty penny. Now if I could just think of a way to make this weekly nose art into a money maker....Peace-
Linda

6 comments:
I guess it will be an endless debate with all the varying opinions. My personal opinion is that the sculpture IS art. From my understanding, what you are doing with Mike's collage is classified as altered art but, still a form of art, though those snobby art critics would probably disagree.
Ah yes, the doggy nose art....gotta love that! lol We seem to get more kid's nose art than doggy nose art....we have a glass pane alongside and running the length of the front door and one of Aaron's friends is constantly sticking his nose/face up against it to peer into our house...sweaty/oily skinned residue...eewwwww!
In college the debate was, "is it art, or is it Art?" As for the sculpture, that's really too bad, and there will probably never be a consensus there, either. Certainly being sculpted from a photo doesn't disqualify it. These days, it's common practice to use photos as reference material, and sculptors as well as painters do it everyday.
I'll be interested to hear how this turns out.
its one of those debates that people will never agree on. personally I think that statue is art, it doesn't matter that it was copied from a photo. The 2 of them are so close, it can be really hard to decide if its art or a craft. A lot of art I have seen in galleries I would actually class as a craft but its labelled art
and we gave up trying to clean the windows when we had our dog, we would clean it, he would look at us and then go right back and put a mark on the window :p
Oh I have missed so many posts in your blog. I didn't know you had started posting as my bloglines was not showing any posts.
I think Mikes collage is going to turn out lovely. The colour scheme looks beautiful.
That statue must surely a land mark in your area. A pity if it has to go.
That statue is wonderful!! I would definately call it Art. I don't really get this big debate that goes on about what is art and what isn't. I think it's just stuck up people trying to act better then everyone else.
The collage you are working on for Mike looks GREAT! I love the colours.
the kiss is ART and is a famous let s put it this way I have heard of this sculpture before I ever got onto computer. I have tried to write my comment 4 times now and I just get to running away with my words (could that be art?) so to me ART is very wide ranging and many of the things that people scoff at now and refuse to put the tag art to will in the future be widely known as art and this arguement will have moved onto the next form of "art" that stretchers the minds of the snobs and the ones who have/not the ??right to claim it as not art.
I love your art collage and look forward to seeing you finish it Linda xoxoxoxox bear xoxoxoxo
Post a Comment